If You Go Looking

Arcturians

XD/1/N

The healers

Described by frequency rather than by body.

Edgar Cayce's readings gave Arcturus a role in the soul's journey; the modern tradition arrives with We, The Arcturians in 1990 and is almost purely channelled. Descriptions concern healing and consciousness rather than craft or biology. Nobody reports meeting one in a field.

If you go looking

Engaged through channellingCommercial ecosystem

Almost entirely channelled, with an extensive paid layer of sessions and healings. There is no inherited practice, only recent ones offered for a fee.

Who should be careful

Reading the code

XD/1/N

Extraterrestrial, unembodied · embodiment 1 of 5, consciousness with no persistent form · source: channelled material · key

Dates

Cayce readings: early 20th century

Modern tradition: 1990

Related

The furthest point of the drift that begins with physical Nordics in 1952 and ends with disembodied light forty years later.

Higher-dimensional collectives →Venusians →Pleiadians →

Terms used on this page

XD: extraterrestrial, unembodied

Origin code

Said to come from outside the Earth, whether another star system or another dimension, and to have no physical body now. A few traditions say they once had one; most never say.

Degree of embodiment: 1, consciousness with no persistent form

Scale, 1 to 5

5 is an ordinary biological body. 4 is physical but manifests oddly. 3 comes and goes. 2 is energetic or subtle. 1 is consciousness with no persistent form. Note that this tends to fall as a tradition ages.

N: channelled material

Source code

Received by a medium speaking on behalf of the intelligence. The content is generally ethical and cosmological rather than descriptive: instruction, not testimony.

Channelling

Term

Material spoken or written by a person said to be relaying a non-human intelligence. It shifts the evidence question entirely: there is no encounter to examine, only a text.

Engaged through channelling

Practice-side

Contact in this tradition means trance, mediumship or automatic writing. The risks are the practice's, not the entity's: dissociation, sustained altered states, and the difficulty of telling one's own material from something external. Least suitable for anyone with a history of psychosis, mania or dissociation.

Commercial ecosystem

Documented harm

A paid economy has grown around this tradition, whether readings, courses, retreats and private sessions, or books, tours and media that keep promising more. Not automatically predatory, but it does mean some of what you will read was written to sell something, and that people in distress are a market.

Deliberate contact work

Read this first

The hazard in this subject attaches to the method, not to which name you aim it at. Ouija work, invocation, sustained channelling, induced hypnagogia, deliberate sleep deprivation and hypnotic regression are the practices associated with difficulty, and a session aimed at a benevolent civilisation is not safer than one aimed at something considered lower. What raises risk is doing it alone, doing it repeatedly, doing it while sleep-deprived, and doing it with an existing vulnerability to psychosis, mania or dissociation. People who get into trouble here overwhelmingly got there through practice, not through reading.

Who should be careful

Practice-side

Anyone with a personal or family history of psychosis, bipolar disorder or dissociative conditions, anyone in acute crisis, and anyone isolated from people who would notice a change in them. Intensive contact practice is destabilising by design (that is what it is for), and destabilisation lands hardest on people already close to an edge.

← Back to all 59 entries