If You Go Looking

Pleiadians

XT/5/C→N

Plejaren · the Meier contacts

Human-looking teachers. Physical in 1975, disembodied by 1992.

Billy Meier's Swiss contacts from 1975, with the most examined and most disputed photographs in the subject's history, established the physical version, though his own term was Plejaren. Barbara Marciniak's Bringers of the Dawn in 1992 then pulled the name into channelled material, where the Pleiadians became largely disembodied. They appear in two branches of this guide for that reason.

If you go looking

Engaged through channellingCommercial ecosystem

The channelled strand supports a large paid ecosystem of readings and activations. The attachment concern in spiritualist practice applies to the method here regardless of how benevolent the described contact is.

Who should be careful

Reading the code

XT/5/C→N

Extraterrestrial, biological · embodiment 5 of 5, an ordinary biological body · source: contactee tradition → channelled material · key

Dates

Contactee version: 1975

Channelled version: 1992

Related

Nordics with an address. Allied with Andromedans and Lyrans in the faction cosmology.

Nordics →Lyrans →Andromedans →Higher-dimensional collectives →

Terms used on this page

XT: extraterrestrial, biological

Origin code

Claimed to have travelled here from another star system in an ordinary physical body.

Degree of embodiment: 5, an ordinary biological body

Scale, 1 to 5

5 is an ordinary biological body. 4 is physical but manifests oddly. 3 comes and goes. 2 is energetic or subtle. 1 is consciousness with no persistent form. Note that this tends to fall as a tradition ages.

C: contactee tradition

Source code

Traceable to one named person's claimed meetings. Detailed, often internally consistent, and rarely corroborated by anyone who did not read the first account.

N: channelled material

Source code

Received by a medium speaking on behalf of the intelligence. The content is generally ethical and cosmological rather than descriptive: instruction, not testimony.

Plejaren, not Pleiadian

Note

Meier's own term for his contacts, who he says come from a dimension adjacent to the Pleiades rather than the visible cluster. The distinction is usually lost in later material.

Channelling

Term

Material spoken or written by a person said to be relaying a non-human intelligence. It shifts the evidence question entirely: there is no encounter to examine, only a text.

Engaged through channelling

Practice-side

Contact in this tradition means trance, mediumship or automatic writing. The risks are the practice's, not the entity's: dissociation, sustained altered states, and the difficulty of telling one's own material from something external. Least suitable for anyone with a history of psychosis, mania or dissociation.

Commercial ecosystem

Documented harm

A paid economy has grown around this tradition, whether readings, courses, retreats and private sessions, or books, tours and media that keep promising more. Not automatically predatory, but it does mean some of what you will read was written to sell something, and that people in distress are a market.

Attachment

Belief within the tradition

Spiritualist and Western esoteric practice holds that contact can leave something behind: an influence that persists after the session and degrades the person's health, mood or judgement. It is a belief rather than a demonstrated mechanism, but it is a serious and internally consistent one, and it is the reason practitioners in those traditions insist on preparation and closing. Reported experiences of it are real experiences whatever their cause, and distressing ones.

Deliberate contact work

Read this first

The hazard in this subject attaches to the method, not to which name you aim it at. Ouija work, invocation, sustained channelling, induced hypnagogia, deliberate sleep deprivation and hypnotic regression are the practices associated with difficulty, and a session aimed at a benevolent civilisation is not safer than one aimed at something considered lower. What raises risk is doing it alone, doing it repeatedly, doing it while sleep-deprived, and doing it with an existing vulnerability to psychosis, mania or dissociation. People who get into trouble here overwhelmingly got there through practice, not through reading.

Who should be careful

Practice-side

Anyone with a personal or family history of psychosis, bipolar disorder or dissociative conditions, anyone in acute crisis, and anyone isolated from people who would notice a change in them. Intensive contact practice is destabilising by design (that is what it is for), and destabilisation lands hardest on people already close to an edge.

← Back to all 59 entries