If You Go Looking

Andromedans

XT/5/C

Moraney and Vasais · the Andromedan Council

Advisers rather than experimenters. Almost all from one author.

Benevolent, tall, sometimes described as blue-skinned, communicating telepathically and acting as advisers rather than experimenters. Almost the entire tradition traces to Alex Collier from the early 1990s and his Defending Sacred Ground. The tell is astronomical: “from Andromeda” is not an address.

If you go looking

A single-origin tradition with an elaborate politics, and a following that has grown well beyond the original account.

Who should be careful

Reading the code

XT/5/C

Extraterrestrial, biological · embodiment 5 of 5, an ordinary biological body · source: contactee tradition · key

Dates

Public accounts from: early 1990s

Related

The most politically elaborated tradition: it supplies the council, the alliances and the opposition that others then borrowed.

Terms used on this page

XT: extraterrestrial, biological

Origin code

Claimed to have travelled here from another star system in an ordinary physical body.

Degree of embodiment: 5, an ordinary biological body

Scale, 1 to 5

5 is an ordinary biological body. 4 is physical but manifests oddly. 3 comes and goes. 2 is energetic or subtle. 1 is consciousness with no persistent form. Note that this tends to fall as a tradition ages.

C: contactee tradition

Source code

Traceable to one named person's claimed meetings. Detailed, often internally consistent, and rarely corroborated by anyone who did not read the first account.

“From Andromeda”

Problem

Andromeda is a galaxy of roughly a trillion stars, 2.5 million light-years away. Saying a civilisation is from Andromeda is not an address in the way “from Sirius” is, and some accounts mean the constellation instead, whose stars are unrelated and at wildly different distances.

Commercial ecosystem

Documented harm

A paid economy has grown around this tradition, whether readings, courses, retreats and private sessions, or books, tours and media that keep promising more. Not automatically predatory, but it does mean some of what you will read was written to sell something, and that people in distress are a market.

Deliberate contact work

Read this first

The hazard in this subject attaches to the method, not to which name you aim it at. Ouija work, invocation, sustained channelling, induced hypnagogia, deliberate sleep deprivation and hypnotic regression are the practices associated with difficulty, and a session aimed at a benevolent civilisation is not safer than one aimed at something considered lower. What raises risk is doing it alone, doing it repeatedly, doing it while sleep-deprived, and doing it with an existing vulnerability to psychosis, mania or dissociation. People who get into trouble here overwhelmingly got there through practice, not through reading.

Who should be careful

Practice-side

Anyone with a personal or family history of psychosis, bipolar disorder or dissociative conditions, anyone in acute crisis, and anyone isolated from people who would notice a change in them. Intensive contact practice is destabilising by design (that is what it is for), and destabilisation lands hardest on people already close to an edge.

← Back to all 59 entries