If You Go Looking

Crash-retrieval occupants

UN/5/W

Non-human biologics · the legacy programme

Bodies said to be held in secret, described by officials rather than witnesses.

The claim that governments have recovered crashed craft and their occupants and kept them in a hidden programme for decades. It began with Roswell and the bodies attached to that story from 1980, ran through the Serpo postings, and reached Congress with David Grusch in 2023. What is new is who is speaking: named former officials, under oath. What has not changed is the evidence, which is always held by someone else. The word “non-human” is chosen with care. It says the bodies are not ours without committing to where they came from, the same move Keel made fifty years earlier.

If you go looking

No practice attachedCommercial ecosystem

Nothing here can be approached: the material is testimony about evidence held by others. The risk is a long, paid media cycle of imminent disclosure, promised many times since the 1990s.

Who should be careful

Reading the code

UN/5/W

Origin uncertain · embodiment 5 of 5, an ordinary biological body · source: official testimony · key

Dates

Roswell: 1947, bodies added 1980

Testimony to Congress: 2023

US file releases: from 2026

Related

The bodies described are usually Grey-type. Serpo is the same strand in its anonymous online form. The careful word “non-human” echoes Keel's refusal to name an origin.

Greys →Ebens →Ultraterrestrials →

Terms used on this page

UN: origin uncertain

Origin code

Reported with some consistency but carrying no origin claim in the encounters themselves. Filing these as alien is an assumption the listener adds.

Degree of embodiment: 5, an ordinary biological body

Scale, 1 to 5

5 is an ordinary biological body. 4 is physical but manifests oddly. 3 comes and goes. 2 is energetic or subtle. 1 is consciousness with no persistent form. Note that this tends to fall as a tradition ages.

W: official testimony

Source code

Claims made on the record by named officials, service personnel or contractors, usually about evidence they say others hold. The speaker is real and accountable; the evidence is not yet public.

Roswell

1947 and 1980

Debris found on a New Mexico ranch in 1947, announced by the Army as a “flying disc” and withdrawn the next day as a weather balloon. The story revived in 1980 with claims of recovered bodies; the US Air Force later attributed the debris to a classified balloon project.

Serpo

2005

An anonymous online release describing a 1965 exchange programme that sent American personnel to another world. No chain of custody, and inconsistencies flagged early, including by researchers otherwise sympathetic to the field.

David Grusch

Testimony, 2023

A former US Air Force intelligence officer who told a House subcommittee in July 2023 that the government holds recovered non-human craft and biological remains. He said his knowledge came from interviews with others; he did not present the material itself.

John Keel

1966–1975

Point Pleasant convinced him the phenomenon was neither extraterrestrial nor consistent. He proposed ultraterrestrials: intelligences that are local, deceptive about their own nature, and not reliably material.

No practice attached

Tradition-side

There is nothing to do here: no inherited method of engagement, whether the tradition is a text, an argument or a set of reports. Anyone offering you one has invented it.

Commercial ecosystem

Documented harm

A paid economy has grown around this tradition, whether readings, courses, retreats and private sessions, or books, tours and media that keep promising more. Not automatically predatory, but it does mean some of what you will read was written to sell something, and that people in distress are a market.

Deliberate contact work

Read this first

The hazard in this subject attaches to the method, not to which name you aim it at. Ouija work, invocation, sustained channelling, induced hypnagogia, deliberate sleep deprivation and hypnotic regression are the practices associated with difficulty, and a session aimed at a benevolent civilisation is not safer than one aimed at something considered lower. What raises risk is doing it alone, doing it repeatedly, doing it while sleep-deprived, and doing it with an existing vulnerability to psychosis, mania or dissociation. People who get into trouble here overwhelmingly got there through practice, not through reading.

Who should be careful

Practice-side

Anyone with a personal or family history of psychosis, bipolar disorder or dissociative conditions, anyone in acute crisis, and anyone isolated from people who would notice a change in them. Intensive contact practice is destabilising by design (that is what it is for), and destabilisation lands hardest on people already close to an edge.

← Back to all 59 entries