If You Go Looking

Orb intelligences

UN/2/E

Foo fighters · lights that behave

Luminous spheres that appear to respond, follow or evade.

A real reporting category with wartime pilot accounts behind it, and a very old folkloric one. It is also the most contaminated entry in the guide, thanks to the photographic problem.

If you go looking

Nothing to engage with. The main risk is interpretive: reading intent into photographic artefacts.

Who should be careful

Reading the code

UN/2/E

Origin uncertain · embodiment 2 of 5, energetic or subtle · source: recurring reports · key

Dates

Pilot reports: 1940s

Photographic surge: 2000s

Related

Continuous with will-o'-the-wisp, corpse candles and the light phenomena of fairy tradition.

Terms used on this page

UN: origin uncertain

Origin code

Reported with some consistency but carrying no origin claim in the encounters themselves. Filing these as alien is an assumption the listener adds.

Degree of embodiment: 2, energetic or subtle

Scale, 1 to 5

5 is an ordinary biological body. 4 is physical but manifests oddly. 3 comes and goes. 2 is energetic or subtle. 1 is consciousness with no persistent form. Note that this tends to fall as a tradition ages.

E: recurring reports

Source code

Described by many apparently unconnected witnesses. The strongest category in the guide, and the smallest.

Foo fighters

1940s

Luminous spheres reported by aircrew of several nations during the Second World War, apparently pacing aircraft. A genuine reporting category predating the modern UFO era.

The photographic problem

Caveat

Dust and moisture close to a camera flash render as bright circles. The digital era produced an enormous volume of these, which contaminates an otherwise long-standing reporting category.

No practice attached

Tradition-side

There is nothing to do here: no inherited method of engagement, whether the tradition is a text, an argument or a set of reports. Anyone offering you one has invented it.

Deliberate contact work

Read this first

The hazard in this subject attaches to the method, not to which name you aim it at. Ouija work, invocation, sustained channelling, induced hypnagogia, deliberate sleep deprivation and hypnotic regression are the practices associated with difficulty, and a session aimed at a benevolent civilisation is not safer than one aimed at something considered lower. What raises risk is doing it alone, doing it repeatedly, doing it while sleep-deprived, and doing it with an existing vulnerability to psychosis, mania or dissociation. People who get into trouble here overwhelmingly got there through practice, not through reading.

Who should be careful

Practice-side

Anyone with a personal or family history of psychosis, bipolar disorder or dissociative conditions, anyone in acute crisis, and anyone isolated from people who would notice a change in them. Intensive contact practice is destabilising by design (that is what it is for), and destabilisation lands hardest on people already close to an edge.

← Back to all 59 entries