If You Go Looking

Nāgas

EL/4/R

Serpent beings of water and the underworld

The serpent archetype's oldest documented form.

Serpentine intelligences across Hindu, Buddhist and Jain traditions, associated with water, rain, subterranean realms and guarded treasure, and capable of taking human form. Powerful and reciprocal rather than simply hostile. They predate every modern reptilian narrative by around two thousand years and owe them nothing.

If you go looking

Element of a living religionReciprocal obligationProtocol exists

Devotional practice with established forms, tied to specific places and observances. Engagement means the tradition's own practice, not summoning.

Who should be careful

Reading the code

EL/4/R

Earth-native, liminal · embodiment 4 of 5, physical but manifests oddly · source: living religion · key

Dates

Attested: ancient South Asia, continuous

Related

Any resemblance to Reptilians runs in one direction only.

Reptilians →Oceanic intelligence →Yakshas and yakshinis →Subterranean populations →

Terms used on this page

EL: Earth-native, liminal

Origin code

Sharing the world with us, ordinarily imperceptible, able to become briefly visible. The oldest and largest branch.

Degree of embodiment: 4, physical but manifests oddly

Scale, 1 to 5

5 is an ordinary biological body. 4 is physical but manifests oddly. 3 comes and goes. 2 is energetic or subtle. 1 is consciousness with no persistent form. Note that this tends to fall as a tradition ages.

R: living religion

Source code

An element of a religion currently practised by large numbers of people, not a folklore curiosity, and handled here accordingly.

Element of a living religion

Tradition-side

Held by very large numbers of people as religious truth rather than folklore. The appropriate approach is the tradition's own, through its own scholars and practitioners, not entity-collecting.

Reciprocal obligation

Tradition-side

The relationship is framed as exchange rather than encounter. Something is owed, offence has consequences, and the arrangement can be broken by carelessness, which makes casual experimentation a category error within the tradition itself.

Protocol exists

Tradition-side

The tradition carries specific rules for approach: things not to accept, say, take or give. Long lists of do-nots usually mean a long history of people treating the encounter as consequential, whatever was actually being encountered.

Deliberate contact work

Read this first

The hazard in this subject attaches to the method, not to which name you aim it at. Ouija work, invocation, sustained channelling, induced hypnagogia, deliberate sleep deprivation and hypnotic regression are the practices associated with difficulty, and a session aimed at a benevolent civilisation is not safer than one aimed at something considered lower. What raises risk is doing it alone, doing it repeatedly, doing it while sleep-deprived, and doing it with an existing vulnerability to psychosis, mania or dissociation. People who get into trouble here overwhelmingly got there through practice, not through reading.

Who should be careful

Practice-side

Anyone with a personal or family history of psychosis, bipolar disorder or dissociative conditions, anyone in acute crisis, and anyone isolated from people who would notice a change in them. Intensive contact practice is destabilising by design (that is what it is for), and destabilisation lands hardest on people already close to an edge.

← Back to all 59 entries