If You Go Looking

Unknown hominid populations

EN/5/E

The zoological reading

Sasquatch-type reports treated strictly as biology.

Kept separate here because the moment such reports acquire lights, telepathy and vanishing, they leave this branch and join the cryptid-adjacent group, and a good deal of the modern material has made exactly that move. Watching a category migrate is more informative than arguing about any single sighting.

If you go looking

A zoological question. The practice risks belong to fieldwork, not to contact.

Who should be careful

Reading the code

EN/5/E

Earth-native, biological · embodiment 5 of 5, an ordinary biological body · source: recurring reports · key

Dates

Modern reporting: 1950s onward

Related

Shares an ecological argument with cryptoterrestrials, and nothing else.

Terms used on this page

EN: Earth-native, biological

Origin code

Ordinary bodies and ordinary evolutionary history. Not us, but never anywhere else either.

Degree of embodiment: 5, an ordinary biological body

Scale, 1 to 5

5 is an ordinary biological body. 4 is physical but manifests oddly. 3 comes and goes. 2 is energetic or subtle. 1 is consciousness with no persistent form. Note that this tends to fall as a tradition ages.

E: recurring reports

Source code

Described by many apparently unconnected witnesses. The strongest category in the guide, and the smallest.

No practice attached

Tradition-side

There is nothing to do here: no inherited method of engagement, whether the tradition is a text, an argument or a set of reports. Anyone offering you one has invented it.

Deliberate contact work

Read this first

The hazard in this subject attaches to the method, not to which name you aim it at. Ouija work, invocation, sustained channelling, induced hypnagogia, deliberate sleep deprivation and hypnotic regression are the practices associated with difficulty, and a session aimed at a benevolent civilisation is not safer than one aimed at something considered lower. What raises risk is doing it alone, doing it repeatedly, doing it while sleep-deprived, and doing it with an existing vulnerability to psychosis, mania or dissociation. People who get into trouble here overwhelmingly got there through practice, not through reading.

Who should be careful

Practice-side

Anyone with a personal or family history of psychosis, bipolar disorder or dissociative conditions, anyone in acute crisis, and anyone isolated from people who would notice a change in them. Intensive contact practice is destabilising by design (that is what it is for), and destabilisation lands hardest on people already close to an edge.

← Back to all 59 entries